In online poker, online satellites illustrate one of the best sources of value, for those who know can utilize them to their full potential. The players are offered access to tournaments which are far above and beyond their real bankrolls in online satellites, giving them the chance to battle for huge prizes, and also to accumulate some really valuable experience in the events in which they would usually not be able to play. You can have a peek here.
Undoubtedly, there are numerous online poker players whose main focus is on these satellites. Some of them are successful and prosperous while others are not.
One of the main blunders satellite beginners commit is that they usually limit themselves from the very beginning, and there is sound mathematical basis behind this kind of thinking, but that doesn’t mean that at the end of the day, it’s not unprofitable.
If a player sees a $100 event he would like to play in, he must say he’ll attempt three $30 satellites. After all, a 4th attempt will cost him a total of $120, and this will cause him to exceed the direct buy-in for the event. While from a mathematical aspect, this type of approach does make perfect sense, from a satellite strategy one, it is unfavourable, as it prevents players from attaining their full potential.
If a player feels that he has an edge playing these satellites, he must go for all the marbles and not surrender just because he doesn’t happen to win straight away.
There are a number of notable differences between regular tournament play and satellite action, mostly arising from the different goals of each. In a regular MTT, the goal of every shrewd player should never be anything short of victory. In an online satellite on the other hand, the goals are generally different. There is not a single winner like that in the conventional sense; instead, there are many winners as there are packages offered by the direct access satellite. For instance, if there are 20 such packages on offer, one can pretty much consider himself a winner as soon as he makes it to the top 20.
During the later stages, the “fox vs. farmer” quandary backs its head. Foxes are the players who act belligerently with victory as their main target. Farmers are those who like to stay out of trouble and only aim to advance a few places deeper. While in a normal tournament, the fox option is evidently the strategically more effective one, in a satellite – on account of the various prize-structures – being a farmer sometimes makes sense too. Exactly how far a player should take the “farmer” approach depends on how many packages the satellite has to offer.